The topic of gender identity is a controversial
topic when studying individuals who deviate from the norms. Individuals who are
transgender have a gender identity which does not match their biological sex.
Much controversy surrounds the basis of gender identity, with some attributing
gender to social factors and others assuming a biological explanation. One
model, shown below (figure 1), highlights the importance of hormones, while
others focus on genetics or environment.
Recent
research has focused on the biological conditions which are correlated with a
high rate of gender role change. In a review of the literature, Peggy T.
Cohen-Kettins examined studies of individuals with 5α-reductase-2-defficiency
(5α-RD 2) or 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase-3 deficiency (17β-HSD-3).
What are 5α-RD 2 and 17β-HSD-3?
5α-RD 2 and
17β-HSD-3 are enzyme deficiencies which result in the outer genitals being incompletely
masculinized. At birth, the individual may be labeled as female due to lack
of external genital features; however, the individual has XY chromosomes,
internal male genital structures, and will develop male secondary sex
characteristics(Cohen et al., 2005).
Frequently the disorder emerges around age 12 when individuals begin to
develop the male secondary sex characteristics. Recent research has found
that the majority of individuals originally raised as female change their
gender identity to male, matching their biological sex.
These
conditions are both rare, caused by autosomal recessive genes (figure 1),
5α-RD 2 affecting 1 in 5,5005-Alpha-Reductase Deficiency and17β-HSD-3 affecting 1 in 127,00017-beta hydroxysteroid deficiency.
Figure
2. Diagram of unaffected parents and the possible genes for their children Wikipedia.
|
Cohen-Kettins found that 56-63% of individuals with
5α-RD 2 and 39-64% of individuals with 17β-HSD-3 assigned a female role at
birth later changed their gender to male. This research has serious
implications on the ways in which we treat individuals with genital ambiguity. As a result of ambiguous genitalia, parents and doctors often feel forced to pick a gender for their child. Many parents choose to have their child’s external genitalia surgically altered to match the gender they select. However, based on this study, approximately half of individuals assigned as female will change their gender identity to male. Therefore, we should not perform genital surgery at a young age as the chosen gender identity may change as a child enters adulthood. As such, “the utmost care should be taken not to assign a gender to the child before evaluation and consultation with an experienced, multidisciplinary team. The first words spoken to the parents are likely to be remembered and should focus on the overall health of the infant” New Internationalist Magazine.
Ethically, making a decision for a young child can be a very difficult decision. Having a child undergo genital reconstruction surgery will lead to large and irreversible changes in the child’s life. While perhaps more of an ethical dilemma than a scientific one, science can help us determine what factors impact an adult’s gender role and better predict outcomes. This is not a universal problem; however, as some societies have adapted to this abnormality. Some areas of the world have an exceptionally high
incidence rate and therefore have special names (such as guevedoche) for these
disorders. In these areas, in which the incidence can be as high as one in 150,
a separate gender category is created. This leads me to wonder if the
current two sex categories are inaccurate. Perhaps these individuals fit into
neither of these categories and exist in a category that we fail to recognize.
If we take a standpoint that focused exclusively on
the role of neonatal androgen levels in the brain, then we would expect to see
all individuals assigned as female seek a change in gender identity due to the
high neonatal testosterone levels. The lack of consensus on gender identity suggests
that there are several other factors, besides genetics, that affect the gender
role of an individual. These factors include the severity of the mutation,
cultural and environmental pressures, a patient’s psychological reaction, and
the reaction of the social environment.
The main problem with this research is that researchers
are unable to directly manipulate the variables and have a randomized,
double-blind procedure. Given the ethics involved in human research, we cannot
manipulate the environment that individuals grow up in and therefore we
must gather information from the experiences of individuals affected by these
disorders. Studying disorders like these provides insight onto different
variables and their effect on an individual’s gender identity; however, this is
just the first step in better identifying the factors that affect an
individual’s gender identity.
No comments:
Post a Comment