In my mind, “good
science” seeks to find a link between the biological or physiological and
social, which is what neuroscience often strives to do. The application of such
science to current social issues is increasingly meaningful as various
disciplines of science gain reputation and legitimacy. One such issue that can
be addressed by scientific study is that of trans* identities and any
biological basis for such identities. In our current society, a trans* identity
is very highly stigmatized and carries many negative repercussions. A study carried out by the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force and National Center for Transgender Equality in 2011 revealed high rates of
poverty, mental illness, suicide, harassment and discrimination in school, the
workplace, healthcare facilities, and in public. Coinciding with this is
limited family acceptance and difficulty acquiring updated identity documents.
Despite the high discrimination and violence faced by trans* individuals, they
remain steadfast in their identities, which to some researchers suggests a
biological difference and basis for their identity even in the face of such
backlash. Recently, neuroscience has sought to draw a link between a biological
basis of trans* identities and social issues in an attempt to further
understand how sex manifests in the human brain and to alleviate the stigma
faced by trans* individuals.
As such, Chia-Shu et
al. (2014) set out to discover differences in brain activity and function
between cis- and transsexuals in regards to body image and found significant
results supporting a biological basis for gender dysphoria as experienced by
trans* individuals. They found there to be significant differences in the body
representation neural network between cis (CIS) and trans (TX) groups, both in
location and in the connectional pattern of neurons, which suggests differences
in functioning and how neurons in the brain activate, as can be seen below in
Figure 1. These findings are in agreement with long-term dysphoric experiences
held by those with gender dysphoria.
Attribution of gender
dysphoria to neurological functioning is an important step to legitimizing the
disorder and to an individual’s desire to identify and present themselves as
male or female through a variety of means. By proving a biological basis for
this disorder, conditions for those suffering from stigma based on their
identity can be greatly improved. Not only will it aid in eliminating stigma
experienced in public, schools, and health care facilities, it will also
improve health outcomes through changes in medical insurance provision and
federal aid. Additionally, it will help to smooth the process of re-issuing of
identification documents with the proper gender and in directing governmental
policy and regulation regarding issues surrounding trans* individuals.
By exploring biological
and physiological effects of what are often considered social phenomena, a link
is created between the two that allows science the capability to significantly
influence current social situations and impact future directions in terms of
policy and decision-making, social acceptance and atmosphere, and quality of
life.
Interesting article! I agree that showing people that there are biological correlates to behavior can legitimize behavior. I.e. Lady Gaga could apply this article to her "Born This Way" theory. However, do you think we should we be concerned that people who see gender-swapping behavior as deviant use this evidence as proof that there is something wrong with transgendered individuals' brains and that we should research a (biological) "cure" for trans-sexuality?
ReplyDelete